Sunday, September 15, 2024

A Few thoughts On Ukraine

 Today, September 16, 2024, is day 936 of Rusia’s genocidal war against Ukraine. There may not be much on TV about it, other than Biden’s continued refusal to allow Ukraine to use U.S. made MGM-140 tactical ballistic missiles to strike targets deep into Russia, even though Starmer would approve it. Free world leaders, except of course Schroeder, are all calling for approval. The war is still going on, Ukrainians are still being killed and Ukraine destroyed.

However, Jake Sullivan, Russia’s greatest American asset besides Trump, is engaged in Escalation Management aka appeasement. From the beginning in February 2022, the White House has been terrified of crossing Putin’s red lines. Putin has successfully cowed America by threatening to use tactical nuclear weapons. It's bullshit.  If Russia used battlefield tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine, Russian forces would suffer an immediate overwhelming NATO conventional response that would wipe out the entire Russian military. Putin is not even sabre rattling; he is rattling the empty scabbard.

America has NOT been stingy in supplying Ukraine with intelligence, and highly accurate U.S. intelligence about Russian troop movements.

The war is fought two ways, on the ground along a 1200 km front, between soldiers of the AFU and the Orcs, and by terror attacks against civilian targets in Ukrainian cities using bombs, rockets, missiles, drones, and tube artillery.

The terror war targets schools, hospitals, apartment blocks and infrastructure. Ukrainian First Deputy Prosecutor General Oleksiy Khomenko stated that Russian forces launched over 1,000 strikes on 200 energy infrastructure facilities since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in February 2022. Ukraine faces a winter with power blackouts from 4 to 12 hours per day. Generators are needed to keep the hospitals going.

Putin’s military has rained down every kind of ballistic missile, drone, and cruise missile in their arsenal on targets in Ukraine including civilian targets in population centers such as Kyiv, Odessa, Kharkiv, Kherson, and Lviv, not to mention all the smaller towns and villages that haven wiped by the Russian military during this war.  Russia has fired so many missiles at Ukraine, they have had to import missiles from North Korea and Iran. 

The Korean missiles are dangerously highly maneuverable but seem to be a high percentage of duds. The ballistic missiles recently sent by Iran via the Caspian sea, are a different matter, and have led to the call of deep strikes into Russia. Iran has previously supplied smaller Fateh-110 and Zolfaghar short range missiles to Russia as well as large stocks of its Shahed Kamikaze drones. 

Ukraine has been supplied with Patriot missiles and shoots down a very high percentage of incoming drones and missile, protecting Kyiv and to an extent other major centres but the downed missiles and drones cause damage where they fall and always some get through. Russia has launched so many massed drone attacks that the supply of Patriot missiles is running low.

Ukraine has developed long range kamikaze drones of its own, striking military targets deep into Russia, oil refineries, tank factories, airports and lately civilian targets in Moscow itself. Russia cannot protect itself, as it is so large with so many good targets. With no sense of irony, Putin has declared these terrorist attacks and threatened all sorts of terrible things in response.


The ground war resembles WWI, well entrenched static lines, using artillery and massed attacks by the Russians who lose about 1200 men per day and large amounts of equipment. The difference is the extensive use of drones, both to target artillery fire and as artillery.

In early August the AFU in a surprise move crossed the border into Kursk Oblast and successfully captured and held a substantial amount of territory. This is hugely embarrassing to Putin who has tried to shrug it off and banned any news reporting other than approved by the Kremlin. Russia has committed about 60,000 troops, many of them conscripts, to drive them out so far unsuccessfully. Ukraine has since penetrated the border in a couple more locations surrounding some 1000 conscripts to be useful as trades for Ukrainian POWs.  

The hope was to draw Russian troops from the Donbas front where Ukraine is struggling against constant Russian attacks. To an extent this has worked, but Russian attacks on Pokrovsk, and Vuhledar continue to make slow progress at the cost of tens of thousands of Russians. Russia no longer tries to capture a community. They simply destroy it and the AFU retreat to the next defensive position. Bakhmut in 2023, Avdiivka by /February 2024, and now Pokrovsk.


Avdiivka



Avdiivka



Russia is on a war economy, oil exports are keeping it afloat, China and Kazakhstan are making end runs around sanctions supplying banned inputs such as chips and other electronic parts. There appears to be no end in sight.

Sunday, September 8, 2024

Driving Miss Daisy Crazy

 A few things came together to inspire today’s blog. First, Americans on Xitter constantly complaining about gas prices, second, a new toy called Perplexity https://www.perplexity.ai/?utm_source=onboardingemail1 which not only answers questions but provides sources for the answers and finally, an article in The Economist describing how Americans are killing each other with heavy ‘light trucks’ which include SUVs.

First I will deal with gas prices, driving distances, and fuel efficiency in Canada and USA. All of this came from asking Perplexity the right questions. I didn’t bother with sources. If you want them, play with the app. And my thanks to an Iowa corn farmer from DC for the tip off.

The average gasoline price in Canada as of August 26, 2024, is approximately CAD 1.79 per liter (USD $1.32 per liter or USD $4.99 per gallon). This includes crude oil costs, refining costs, wholesale and retail markups, and federal and provincial taxes, including the federal carbon tax. This is slightly higher than the world average of USD 1.24 per liter.

The current national average gas price in the United States is $3.32 (CAD $4.48) per gallon (CAD $1.19 per liter) as of September 5, 2024. This is down from $3.44 in mid-August, but higher than the 6-year national average of $3.05 per gallon since 2018

In 2023, the average gas price in USA was $3.52 ($4.76, $1.26/l) per gallon, down from $3.95 ($5.34, $141/l) in 2022. The highest weekly national average since 2018 was $4.99 ($6.74, $1.78/l) per gallon in June 2022 and the lowest weekly national average since 2018 was $1.84 ($2.49, $0.66/l)) per gallon in April 2020 during the pandemic.

The average Canadian driver typically travels around 15,200 kilometers (9400 miles) per year, ranging from Newfoundland and Labrador: 18,100 km (11,200 miles), Prairies 15,300 km (9,500 miles) to BC 13,100 (8,100 miles).

The average American drives approximately 13,500 miles (21,700 km) per year or 37 miles (60 km) per day, with drivers aged 35-54 averaging 15,291 miles (24,600 km) per year. Wyoming has the highest average of 24,000 miles (38,600 km) per year while DC has the lowest with only 6,700 (10,800 km). American men average 16,550 miles (26,650 km) per year and American women average 10,142 miles (16,300 km) annually.

The average gasoline mileage for new vehicles in America in 2022 is currently 26 mpg (11.1 l/100 km), reflecting ongoing improvements in fuel efficiency despite challenges in meeting stricter fuel economy standards. According to recent data, the average fuel consumption for vehicles in Canada is approximately 8.9 L/100 km (20.9 mpg).

Canadian fuel economy is roughly 25% better than USA. The reason for that becomes apparent in these articles from The Economist.

America’s Love Affair With Big Cars is Killing Them

When two vehicles collide, it is usually the heavier one that prevails. When a passenger car crashes with a pickup truck or sport-utility vehicle (SUV), the driver of the car is likely to die around three times as often. 

Between 1990 and 2005 the market share of SUVs in America grew from 6% to 26%, pushing up the weight of an average new car from 3,400lb to nearly 4,100lb.

For every deadly crash avoided by an SUV or pickup truck, there were an additional 4.3 deaths among other drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Studies have estimated that when a car crashes with an SUV or pickup, rather than another car, the driver’s fatality rate increased by 31%. When two cars crash, a 1,000lb increase in the weight of one vehicle raised the fatality rate in the other by 47%.

The Economist compiled ten years’ worth of crash data from across 14 states, including millions of crashes between 2013 and 2023. These data yielded roughly 10m crashes. After dropping observations with missing data, we were left with around 7.5m two-vehicle crashes involving more than 15m cars.

Their data show that heavier vehicles are safer for their occupants than lighter ones. The fatality rate is roughly seven times higher when colliding with a heavy pickup truck than with a compact car. As the weight of your car increases, the risk of killing others increases dramatically.

The heaviest 1% of vehicles in their dataset—those weighing around 6,800lb—suffer 4.1 “own-car deaths” per 10,000 crashes, on average but were responsible for 37 “partner-car deaths” per 10,000 crashes. Cars in the middle of the sample weighing 3,500lb, suffer around 6.6 “own-car deaths” per 10,000 crashes, but were responsible for 5.7 “partner-car deaths” per 10,000 crashes, on average. The lightest 1% of vehicles weighing just 2,300lb, had 15.8 “own-car deaths” per 10,000 crashes. and 2.6 “partner-car deaths” per 10,000 crashes.

Vehicles in the top 10% of the sample—those weighing at least 5,000lb—are involved in roughly 26 deaths per 10,000 crashes, on average, including 5.9 in their own car and 20.2 in partner vehicles. For vehicles in the next-heaviest 10% of the sample—those weighing between 4,500lb and 5,000lb—the equivalent figures are 5.4 and 10.3 deaths per 10,000 crashes.

 In 2023 vehicles weighing more than 5,000lb accounted for a whopping 31% of new cars, up from 22% five years earlier. “As you see the vehicle fleet around you getting heavier, then you want to protect yourself rationally by buying a bigger and heavier car.” a Cold War scenario. Such rational individual decisions have led to a suboptimal outcome for society as a whole, as people are rationally concerned about their own safety.

Regulators are ill-equipped to fix the problem. America’s tax system subsidises heavier vehicles by setting more lenient fuel-efficiency standards for light trucks (including SUVs) and allowing bosses who purchase heavy-duty vehicles for business purposes to deduct part of the cost from their taxable income. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), America’s top auto-safety agency only takes account of the safety of the occupants of the vehicle in question, not that of other drivers.

The shift towards electric power is likely to increase their weight further, as battery-powered vehicles tend to be heavier than their internal-combustion equivalents. (Note: as they are virtually friction free they can travel at very high speeds unless speed controls are built into their computer systems. My son has seen them on the Edmonton-Calgary highway traveling at super speeds)

Why American cars are so big

In 1975, in response to the 1973 oil crisis, the federal government imposed fuel-economy standards on carmakers. To ease the burden on small businesses that relied on big vehicles, the government exempted “light trucks”, any vehicle that could be used off road and weighed less than 8,500lb (3855kg). That meant SUVs—typically among the biggest and least-efficient cars—were swept into the category and avoided the new fuel standards.

Because making light trucks held to lower environmental standards was more profitable, automakers marketed big models, including SUVs, enthusiastically. They portrayed them as quintessentially American, embodying freedom, strength and adventurousness. By 2002 light trucks, including SUVs, made up a bigger share of light-duty vehicle sales than cars. By the 1990s gasoline had become cheaper in America than in other rich countries—so the cost of running a big car did not deter buyers. Such models are convenient for suburban living, and consumers see them as safe. 

And EVs are developing the same weight problem as conventional cars. The EPA does not regulate EVs’ indirect emissions, even though heavier models require more electricity to charge, and need bigger batteries, which contain more of the scarce metals used to make those batteries. In 2022 60% of electric-vehicle sales in America were SUVs.

Conclusion

Nothing is likely to change in the near or medium term, though the EPA is tightening the definition of light trucks. Running on a platform of higher gas prices, slower speeds and smaller vehicles is a recipe for political suicide. Canada’s Carbon Tax is about as popular as a skunk at a picnic.


Sunday, September 1, 2024

Back in the Saddle Again

 September 1st and time to start blogging again. Summer has come and gone. My intentions are to blog weekly or is it weakly? Anyway we all know which road is paved with good intentions.