Election Results (source National Post) |
Canada
held its 43rd Federal election on October 21st, 2019. The
results are a Liberal minority government with the New Democrats in a position
of power. The Liberals were shut out of Alberta and Saskatchewan but did well east of Manitoba
For the second time in Canadian history, a government will be
formed that does not have the highest popular vote. The Liberals have 33.1% to
the Conservatives 34.4%.
In 2015 Justin Trudeau campaigned on changing the
electoral system to some form of proportional representation (PR) rather than
first past the post or FPP. PR is back in the limelight again, as the actual seats won
by the parties have little relationship to their share of the popular vote.
I have strongly opposed
PR because of my experience with Ukraine’s electoral system and wonderful
examples like Italy. However, a Facebook friend, Daren
Schemmer, of Simon Fraser University (SFU)[1]
who has been patient with me for four years, suggested I check out the system
used by Ireland and New Zealand. I did and now I’m a believer.[2]
I examined seats won and seats that would have been won on Canadian
wide PR or on Province Wide PR. Twelve seats are required to be a recognized
political party in Canada, so I arbitrarily did not count parties with less
than 3.5% of the vote*. To give the territories (YT, NT, NU) some choice, I also lumped the
three together for a final scenario**.
Party Representation by
Various Electoral Systems
% Votes
|
Actual
|
Country*
|
Provincial*
|
Provincial**
|
|
Liberal
|
33.1%
|
157
|
115
|
116
|
115
|
Conservative
|
34.4%
|
121
|
119
|
118
|
119
|
New Democratic
|
15.9%
|
24
|
55
|
56
|
56
|
Bloc Quebecois
|
7.7%
|
32
|
27
|
26
|
26
|
Green
|
6.5%
|
3
|
23
|
22
|
22
|
People's Party
|
1.7%
|
||||
Independent/other
|
0.4%
|
1
|
|||
Other
|
99.7%
|
338
|
338
|
338
|
338
|
Technically, the Conservatives, under provincial
proportional representation could have formed a minority government, IF any of
the other parties would agree to any of their legislation. I cannot imagine a Conservative
budget that would not lose a vote of non-confidence.
Alberta has another legitimate grip about the number of
seats relative to population. Both Alberta and BC are underrepresented in the House
of Commons based on population. So is Ontario. The rules around composition
of the House of Commons are quite complex and involve a great deal of
horse-trading, however they have been changed frequently and should be so again,
even for FPP.
Provincial Representation in the House of Commons
Name
|
2019 Population
|
2019
Constituencies
|
Pop’n per
Constituency
|
Par with Quebec
|
Ontario
|
14,446,515
|
121
|
119,393
|
134
|
Quebec
|
8,433,301
|
78
|
108,119
|
78
|
British Columbia
|
5,020,302
|
42
|
119,531
|
46
|
Alberta
|
4,345,737
|
34
|
127,816
|
40
|
Manitoba
|
1,360,396
|
14
|
97,171
|
13
|
Saskatchewan
|
1,168,423
|
14
|
83,459
|
11
|
Nova Scotia
|
965,382
|
10
|
96,538
|
9
|
New Brunswick
|
772,094
|
11
|
70,190
|
7
|
Newfoundland
|
523,790
|
7
|
74,827
|
5
|
Prince Edward Is.
|
154,748
|
4
|
38,687
|
1
|
Northwest Territory
|
44,598
|
1
|
44,598
|
1
|
Yukon
|
40,369
|
1
|
40,369
|
1
|
Nunavut
|
38,787
|
1
|
38,787
|
1
|
338
|
350
|
Provincial PR allows for regional parties such as the BQ but
does not allow for non-affiliated or independents. Jody Wilson-Raybould would
not have a seat under such a scenario. Fringe parties such as the PPC, are kept
to a minimum, though no one knows how the votes would go under a proportional system.
However, a system like Ireland with three seats to a constituency
does allow independents. That would look after the three territories. It provides
a certain amount of leeway for everyone’s choice to be recognized and allows
for some feeling of local representation as well. Apparently, five seats per
constituency prevent any form of Gerrymandering.
Voting is done by Single Transferable Vote, where candidates
are ranked by choice of the voter. Where this is done in a single constituency
it is known as the Instant Run-off Vote. Australia uses this system. Figuring
out how to count STV
ballots appears extremely complicated. If there is no simple way that can
be explained in less than a minute, it is a non-starter in my books and maybe
why it didn’t go over in BC.
Whether the Liberals can be forced to live up to their 2015
promise now that they have to depend on parties that favour it to stay in
power remains to be seen.
[1]
Good thing Simon Fraser’s middle name wasn’t Thomas or the university would be
known as STFU.
[2]
You now have an earworm, you say? You’re welcome.
It's hard to believe that any party which has come to power via the first-past-the-post system will voluntarily bring in a PR system because it will work to their disadvantage in the next election. However, I agree that Ireland/NZ are better systems than a pure PR system which can result in endlessly revolving coalition governments and new elections.
ReplyDeleteDon't the Liberals and Conservatives now use an STV system when electing their national leaders? I don't think the results have been all that satisfactory, have they?
Can't say about the leadership ballot process. Agree that the two main parties have nothing to gain from PR.
DeleteI had hoped that Trudeau meant a lot of his promises in 2015 but he has turned out to be an utter disappointment and even an embarrassment. Why should electoral reform be any different, I guess. Like Debra, I don't forsee the issue getting any traction in the future either because it's not beneficial to the top two parties. It's all about power!
ReplyDeleteI hope Freeland replaces Tried before the next election
DeleteWe had a referendum about proportional representation last year, accompanied by a very poorly-written explanation of how it would actually work. After I unraveled all the complex weasel-words, it turned out that the proposed version of PR would open the door for political parties to bait-and-switch. We could vote for one candidate and end up being represented by someone completely different. It also allowed parties to arbitrarily alter the representation without the knowledge or consent of the constituents.
ReplyDeleteOur current electoral system is badly broken; but the version of proportional representation that was proposed last year was not the right fix. Maybe next time...
I'm convinced that there was full intent to confuse. Same with the questions that the Liberals posed on line. If people don't understand it they will vote No. Problem solved for the politicians. Cynical? Who me?
DeleteThanks for the shout-out, Allen, and the joke about SFU. Actually, in 2005, 58% of British Columbians did vote 57.7% in favour of changing to an STV system, but the provincial government of the day had set the bar at a super-majority with more than 50% in favour in 53 of 69 ridings (a bar easily met) as well as a minimum of 60% across the whole province. Sad day.
ReplyDeleteIt was a remarkable exercise in democracy through, as the STV system was chosen by 161 people selected at random from across the province who looked at different voting systems for a year and recommended STV.
The referenda are designed to fail. Politicians can then claim they tried but the people didn't want it. If it can't be explained in one or two minutes so everyone can clearly understand it will go no where
Delete