Saturday, December 31, 2011

Anton Chekhov on Occupy Wall Street

Just look at this life: the insolence and idleness of the strong, the ignorance and brutishness of the weak, impossible poverty all around us, overcrowding, degeneracy, lies . . . Yet in all the houses and streets, it’s quiet, peaceful; of the fifty thousand people who live in town there is not one who would cry out or become loudly indignant.  We see those who go to the market to buy food, eat during the day, sleep during the night, who talk their nonsense, get married, grow old, complacently drag their dead to the cemetery; but we don’t see or hear those who suffer and the horrors of life go on somewhere behind the scenes. Everything is quiet, peaceful and only mute statistics protest: so many gone mad, so many buckets (of vodka) drunk, so many children dead of malnutrition . . . And this order is obviously necessary; obviously the happy man feels good only because the unhappy bear their burden silently and without that silence happiness would be impossible. . .

At the door of every contented happy man someone should stand with a little hammer, constantly tapping, to remind him that unhappy people exist, that however happy he may be, sooner or later life will show him its claws, some calamity will befall him – illness, poverty, loss – and nobody will hear or see, just as he doesn’t hear or see others, now. But there is nobody with a little hammer, the happy man lives on, and the petty cares of life stir him only slightly as the wind stirs and aspen – and everything is fine. . .

Wait in the name of what, I ask you? In the name of what considerations? They tell me that it can’t be done all at once, that every idea is realized gradually, in due time.  But who says that?  Where are the proofs that it is so?  You refer to the natural order of things, to the lawfulness of phenomena, but there is order and lawfulness in the fact that I, a living and thinking man, must stand in a ditch and wait until it gets over grown or silted up, when I could perhaps jump over it or build a bridge across it?  And again, wait in the name of what? Wait, when you haven’t the strength to live and yet you must live and want to live! . . .

. . . don’t settle in, don’t let yourself fall asleep! As long as you’re young, strong, energetic, don’t weary of doing good! There is no happiness and there shouldn’t be, and if there is any meaning and purpose in life, then that meaning and purpose are not at all in our happiness, but in something intelligent and great.  Do good!
 Excerpts from Gooseberries 1898
Chekhov wrote these words less than two decades before the Revolution of 1917 that changed Russia - and the whole world - forever and only 7 years before the Revolution of 1905 which began a period of reform which was - as always - too little, too late... 


  1. A happy new year to you and your wife of five years. Also a belated Christmas greeting.
    Have enjoyed following your life for the past few months and I must say the years have not slowed you down.

    Best wishes and God Bless.

  2. Thanks, Blair. The years couldn't slow me down as I always was pretty slow. Fewer moving parts than a civil servant. The years have made me more radically left in my thinking as I have has opportunity to view far too much injustice. As someone said, if hard work made you rich, every woman in Africa would be a millionaire.

  3. How little the human condition has changed in 100 years. Thought-provoking words.

    I hope you and yours had a lovely holiday, Blog Fodder, and that 2012 is a good year. By the way, those penguins below are very creative. Almost too cute to eat. But I love olives and cream cheese ... yum.

  4. Sometimes I wonder if people in hard situations are as unhappy as we think they are..does that make sense? With all the recent over thrown govts are they better off or not?

  5. Thank you, CD. Glad someone loves olives.
    afcg, they are unhappy, don't ever kid yourself. If they over throw the government are they better off? Only if they truly over throw it. Look at Egypt. Did they over throw the government? No. The faces change at the top but the conduct carries on as before. The establishment do NOT give up their privileges easily.
    The French and the Russians understood what it meant to truly overthrow the government. In the short run, lots of blood. In the long run, certainly the people were better off in general.


Comments are encouraged. But if you include a commercial link, it will be deleted. If you comment anonymously, please use a name or something to identify yourself. Trolls will be deleted